What are the smart folks doing, and how can I copy them?If you fine fo. The deployment is 50-80ish desktop workstations.
#NAT LOOPBACK MERLIN PC#
I'll be doing my first PC rollout as manager of the department this year, and I really want to get as smooth an experience as possible. Which vendors would you recommend for your next workstation rollout? Hardware.I was trying to see how long of a ping time (along with some other information) that the cu. CMD != Powershell.I was assisting a customer today and had their security guy on the remote meeting as well. CMD != Powershell SecurityĪs the title says, this is just a friendly reminder. While most of us will celebrate by getting drunker than a skunk, we also celebrate the death of St Patrick, the Christian Missionary, Bishop, and Apostl.
Today in History: 461 - Saint Patrick diesTip o me hat to ye lads and lasses, its St.
#NAT LOOPBACK MERLIN PRO#
If you can access the CCTV using that method, the problem is in your router config. That has the effect of making any request to 192.168.1.100:37777 go directly to it rather than going out the gateway. Temporarily change the IP config of a device on the 192.168.16.0 subnet and give it a 255.255.0.0 subnet mask.That has the effect of putting both subnets on the same LAN and removes that router from the equation AND Plug the cable currently going into the WAN socket on 192.168.1.1 into a LAN socket on 192.168.1.1.You * might* try doing the following as a test: Since you are running a 3rd-party firmware on that router (and I have zero familiarity with that product), I would check that the ACL for the incoming port (if ACLs have been implemented) allows connections from the 192.168.16.0 subnet,īased on what you have said, it should be as simple as accessing the WAN port of the 192.168.1.1 router but since it doesn't work, there is obviously something else in play.I would log into 192.168.1.1 and make sure that it is actually listening on 37777 and that there is no port translation taking place on the 192.168.16.1 router AND.I would expect the router at 192.168.16.1 to be port forwarding 37777 to 192.168.16.87 (the WAN port of the CCTV's router) BUT.I can only suspect it's the 192.168.1.1 router doing something funnyĮxternal users are able to access the CCTV via, say, an address such as dvr.your-external-domain,com:37777 (sounds like a Dahua DVR) then
The 192.168.16.1 router should be treating it as a internal connection so routing should not apply. I wish hairoinning / nat loopback was available as this would make it just work. If your internal users are not getting to the CCTV using 192.168.16.87:37777 but external users get to it, then I suspect the details you have supplied are wrong. You can use the actual 192.168 addresses. How about a diagram showing the actual inside and outside addresses of the CCTV router and the inside address of the. What is the subnet that your users are on? Is it. Shall we start again? From the beginning? Your diagram says CCTV is on 192.168.1.87 You are correct 16.x router is port forwarded to 192.168.16.87 and the the 1.x router is port forwarded to 1.100